PROTOCOL FOR THE PILOTING OF THE FIRST VERSION OF THE GLOBAL
STUDY’S PRACTITIONER HANDBOOK
(Version 18/01/04)
1. INTRODUCTION
The first version of the Handbook to be piloted is the result of
multi-pronged approach :
- extraction of information and issues from the relevant Anglophone,
francophone and Hispanic specialised literature;
- 5 cases studies in different contexts (Sri Lanka, Angola, Colombia,
Afghanistan, Eastern DRC);
- the analysis of a dozen different types of handbooks; and
- a strong steering process by an inter-agency group (bringing together NGO,
UN agencies).
The first version will go through a series of "test and
review" processes comprising :
- the distribution of a questionnaire with the Handbook itself, so that
interested individuals or teams can feed-back their remarks for the revision
process;
- the collection of feed-back from experts on participation and on technical
issues and;
- an inter-active debate through the Global Study website (www.globalstudyparticipation.org)
- the formal field piloting with a group of interested agencies.
The present protocol addresses the methodology for the latter.
2. HYPOTHESES AND ASSUMPTION
A certain number of hypotheses and assumptions have been made
during the process of the elaboration of the Handbook.
- it should be a stand-alone document requiring support training in only a
limited number of situations;
- it should help both decision makers who have to decide on policy, and
field-workers who have to "do the job";
- it should make sense for both international and national NGOs.
The Handbook should thus be clear and understandable,
easy-to-use, and should really be perceived as helpful by the end-of-the-chain
users (field workers).
3. FIELD PILOTING : A TWO-PHASE PROCESS
The ideas is to test the Handbook through an exercise which will
be both comprehensive and light for the agencies who volunteer for the piloting
process.
It will be based on a process including two visits:
- Visit 1 : one week, comprising a presentation of the process that led to
the Handbook elaboration, and a presentation of the issues on which the
authors of the Handbook require feed-back, as well as any other points
deemed relevant to the Handbook revision by the agency team. During this
first visit, a mechanism for the collection of remarks, ideas, suggestions
will be presented and discussed with the field staff. It will comprise,
among other elements, the distribution of diaries with which staff can
collect their views and ideas in a systematic and organised manner;
- Visit 2 : This second visit will entail a thorough collection of
feed-back, through the gathering of written notes and diaries, a workshop
and visit to various activities with field staff.
4. THE REVISION PROCESS
After information is collected, a two-day Working Group workshop
will be organised to take stock of the wealth of ideas and to decide
strategically on how to incorporate them in the Handbook revision. There is an
interesting option to invite a number of experts on participation at this
workshop.
On this basis, the Groupe URD team will produce a first draft of
the second version to be re-circulated within the Working Group and, potentially,
to an enlarged group. A second draft will thus be produced by Groupe URD for
final revision, copy editing and formatting.