www.alnap.org

 

2002/03

 

 

 

ALNAP, as a unique sectorwide active-learning membership network, is dedicated to improving the accountability and quality of humanitarian action, by sharing lessons; identifying common problems; and, where appropriate, building consensus on approaches.

 

 

 

Introduction

 

The Active Learning Network for Accountability and Performance in Humanitarian Action (ALNAP) was established in 1997 as an international sectorwide forum to address learning, accountability and quality issues within the Humanitarian Sector. ALNAP encourages self-criticism and learning by ensuring that no one type of organisation is able to dominate discussions or set the agenda.

 

Target Audience

 

ALNAP’s primary target groups are those who have responsibility for and/or are engaged in:

 

·        development and interpretation of policy;

·        design and management of operations;

·        organisational learning; and

·        accountability (including governance and external scrutiny).

 

ALNAP fosters a culture of active learning, accountability and quality throughout the sector to facilitate improved performance

 

 

Membership and Structure

 

ALNAP has 51 Full Member organisations, over 280 Observer Members, and is governed by an elected Steering Committee of 8 Full Member representatives. ALNAP’s work is managed by a small Secretariat, hosted by the Overseas Development Institute (ODI).

 

Funding

 

ALNAP is currently funded by over 50% of its Full Member organisations. Members also provide in-kind support eg, translation of ALNAP publications; hosting of meetings; and secondment of personnel to ALNAP activities.

 

 

Network activities

 

Facilitating sectorwide networking is ALNAP’s primary function. These activities include all information synthesis, dissemination and exchange activities.

 

·        Biannual Meetings: twice yearly ALNAP Full Member representatives come together over two days to share information and perspectives, and through a process of debate and prioritisation, determine ALNAP’s workplan.

·        ALNAP Annual Review Series: published every April, in addition to providing a synthesis and meta-evaluation of available evaluations of humanitarian action, the Annual Review addresses a current theme within the humanitarian sector and highlights key challenges for the sector.

·        Key Messages: short briefing papers on the key messages arising from ALNAP’s research/work.

·        Training Modules: training modules are developed to disseminate good practice identified through ALNAP’s research activities. The modules are available as a free good on the ALNAP website. 

·        Evaluative Reports Database: a fully-searchable online collection of evaluative reports of humanitarian action (eg, evaluations, reviews, lesson learning studies, conference proceedings and syntheses) with key sections accessible.

 

 

Programme activities

 

ALNAP commissioned research focusing on key issues for the sector as identified by the Full Members at Biannual Meetings.

 

·        Strengthening Programme Monitoring Systems in the Humanitarian Sector: This 2-year phased study seeks to strengthen programme monitoring systems to ensure that lessons are learned, and appropriate modifications made, during the course of an intervention. Equally important is the need to ensure that these lessons are captured to inform future performance in humanitarian action.

·        Programme and Evaluation Guidance Gap Filling: A series of guidance booklets developed by ALNAP to address gaps in current guidance. Planned guidance in the series are: Evaluating Humanitarian Action (2002);  Protection: Strengthening Performance Frameworks for Protection, for Mandated and non-mandated Humanitarian Organisations (2003); and Capacity Building and Context Analysis (2004).

·        Improving learning: Documentation and comparative assessment of 2-3 approaches to After Action Review (AAR) in the sector. This involves assessing AAR processes of selected ALNAP Full Member organisations. The assessment involves real-time observation of an AAR process and interviews with participants.

 

 

Interest Group Activities

 

The interest group process allows proposals developed within ALNAP, for which there is no implementation or funding capacity, to go forward under the leadership of a group of interested Members.

 

·        Consultation and Participation in Humanitarian Action: this 18-month study, incorporating case studies in 5 emergency contexts, aims to identify good practice on consultation with, and participation by, beneficiaries and affected populations in the planning, management, monitoring and evaluation of humanitarian programmes. Key outputs will be 5 individual case study Monographs, a Practitioner Handbook, and an Overview Book. It is anticipated that findings will also be  incorporated into an ALNAP training module.

·        Testing the Learning Support Office Concept: the aim is to improve field-level learning through the promotion and facilitation of three-way learning activities: i. Learning In; ii. Learning Out; and, iii Lateral Learning. The Learning Support Office will offer an independent learning resource accessible by all within the sector.

 

 

Available from www.alnap.org

 

-          Training modules:

1. Introduction to Evaluation;

2. Evaluating Humanitarian Action; and,

3. Managing and Facilitating the Evaluation of Humanitarian Action Process.

-          ALNAP Annual Review 2001

-          Key Messages sheets

-          Online Useful Resources Database

-          Evaluative Reports Database (ERD)

-          Annual Reports

-          Meeting Records and updates of Full Member’s current and future  learning and accountability initiatives.

 

ALNAP studies and background papers:

 

-          Aid Responses to Afghanistan: Lessons from Previous Evaluations, December 2001

-          Follow-up to Evaluations of Humanitarian Programmes, April 2001

-          Kosovo Humanitarian Programme Evaluations: Towards Synthesis, Meta-analysis and Sixteen Propositions for Discussion, October 2000

-          Mapping Accountability in Humanitarian Assistance, May 2000

 

Books available to order

 

-          ALNAP (2002) Humanitarian Action: Improving performance through improved learning ALNAP Annual Review 2002. London: ALNAP

 

-          Wood, A. Apthorpe, R. and J. Borton (eds) (2001) Evaluating International Humanitarian Action: Reflections from practitioners. London: ALNAP/Zed Books

 

 

 

ALNAP Full Members

 

Africa Humanitarian Action, Prof. Apthorpe, AusAID, BADC, John Borton, BRCS, CAFOD/Caritas, CARE International, CIDA, Ian Christoplos, DANIDA, DFA Ireland, DFID, DMI, ECHO, Emma Ltd., ETC UK, FAO, Groupe URD, Humanitarian Accountability Project, ICVA, ICRC, IFRC, InterAction, JICA, MFA France, MFA Germany, MFA Netherlands, MFA Norway, MSF-H, OXFAM, ODI, People in Aid, SCF UK, SCHR, SDC, Prof. Shaw, SIDA, SPHERE, Tufts University, UNDP, UNHCR, UNHCHR, UNICEF, UNOCHA, USAID/OFDA, VOICE, WFP, WHO, World Bank, World Vision.

 

 

ALNAP’s existence reflects a sectorwide desire to improve performance in humanitarian action, and recognition that:

 

§         this requires sectorwide change as well as change within individual organisations;

§         existing mechanisms are not sufficiently inclusive to facilitate sectorwide change;

§         individual organisations will benefit from a sharing of perspectives and experiences in their efforts to improve active learning, accountability and quality within the sector.

 

 

For further information please contact the ALNAP Secretariat:

 

ALNAP at ODI,

111 Westminster Bridge Road, London SE1 7JD, UK. 

Tel: +44 (0)20 7922 0300

Fax: +44 (0)20 7922 0399

alnap@odi.org.uk    http://www.alnap.org

 

Secretariat Coordinator: John Mitchell <j.mitchell@odi.org.uk>